An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws
Blog Article
9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution can be justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears as well as a new system is place in its place.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the acquired counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this element for interim custody of the subject premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 in the Constitution. Read more
Unfortunately, that wasn't true. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son instructed his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to getting sexually molested the pair’s son several times.
For your foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order as to cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted within a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based about the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is obtainable in specific limited situations, it is actually generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it's handy for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to eliminate a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got attained to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it has reached this sort of stage. Read more
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-thirty day period report on the court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the summary or the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal to your facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case regulation in a very particular court. Indeed, Each and every circuit has its have set of binding case legislation. Subsequently, a judgment rendered inside the Ninth Circuit will not be binding from the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar issue. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in implementing the law. This example of case legislation refers to 2 cases read from the state court, with the same level.
seventeen . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have heard the realized counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession from the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should get more info see this part for interim custody of the topic premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It's also a very well-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.